PERBANDINGAN DAN PENILAIAN PEMELIHARAAN FASAD CW DAN ACP BANGUNAN GEDUNG TERHADAP PERMEN PUNO.24/PRT/M/2008
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17977/10.17977/um071v27i1.12022p1-11Keywords:
Maintenance, Facade, Curtain Wall, Aluminum Composite PanelAbstract
Façade maintenance is often neglected and seems imprecise due to many factors, one of which
is the location of the facade which is quite difficult to reach. Whereas maintenance on the facade is very
important because the facade is the earliest part that is seen from a building and becomes a characteristic
of the building, the maintenance applied should not be modest, but must be optimal and heed the relevant
regulations. This study reviews by comparing and assessing the maintenance of the facade of the curtain
wall material and aluminium composite panel with the Minister of Public Works Regulation No.
24/PRT/M/2008. Data collection methods used are interviews and questionnaires and to analyse using
qualitative descriptive methods and percentages. From this method, it is possible to investigate the
comparison of procedures in the field with procedures based on Permen PU No.24/PRT/M/2008 and the
level of conformity of the procedures under review. Based on the results of the comparative analysis, the
two procedures have similarities and differences, the procedures in the field as a whole are not in
accordance with the procedures for the Minister of Public Works No. 24/PRT/M/2008, but the procedures
in the field also have their own advantages. Based on the assessment, the level of conformity of the
procedures in the field with the Minister of Public Works No. 24/PRT/M/2008 overall reached 86.64%.
Meanwhile, based on the grouping of respondents, the score was 66.17% for group I, 78.95% for group II
and 91.14% for group III. The overall results stated that the maintenance carried out was not fully in
accordance with the regulations, but the results obtained showed good results, where the percentage
obtained was more than 50%, this indicates that more than half of the maintenance was carried out by
heeding the regulations
References
Direktorat Jendral Cipta Karya. 2008. Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum No.24/PRT/M/2008 tentang Pedoman Pemeliharaan dan Perawatan Bangunan Gedung, Departemen Pekerjaan Umum.
Delio, D. 2015. Analisis Pemeliharaan Bangunan Gedung Rumah Sakit Umum di Kota Dili. Fakultas Teknik, Jurusan Teknik Sipil. Universitas Atmajaya Yogyakarta.
Purnomo, E. 2017. Evaluasi Dan Penilaian Aset Bangunan (Studi Kasus Gedung Bppka Kota Probolinggo). Fakultas Teknik. Universitas Jember.
Revmen & Trijeti. 2015. Tinjauan Metode Pelaksanaan Akibat Kerusakan Rangka Facade Curtain Wall Sistem Unitized. Fakultas Teknik. Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta.
Triayu, M. 2014. Studi Tentang Pemeliharaan Bangunan Kampus II Gedung Thomas Aquinal. Universitas Atmajaya Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta.
Triyanto & Sabatari, W. 2010. Kolaborasi Penilaian Subyektif dan Obyektif (Suatu Bentuk Penilaian Karya Busana Yang Terpadu, Mumpuni, dan Terintegrasi). Jurnal Penabur.
Utami, M., Rizki, K., dkk. 2015. Sistem Pemasangan Dan Pemeliharaan Selubung Kulit Bangunan Keramik
Pada Daerah Tropis. https://tugasgeografi.wordpress.com/2011/02/25/klasifikasi-iklim/
Dari Veronika. 2017. Kinerja Pemeliharaan Bangunan Menurut Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Nomor 24/PRT/M/2008 (Studi Kasus Hotel Santika Premiere Jogja). Universitas Atmajaya Yogyakarta.
Yanti, N. 2019. Service Quality dalam Mengukur Kepuasan Pasien terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Di Rumah Sakit Ibnu Sina Kecamatan Indrapura Kabupaten Aceh Besar. Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam. Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry. Banda Aceh
Yunita, A., Suraji, A., Sunaryati, J. 2017. Studi Evaluasi Pemeliharaan Bangunan Gedung Perkantoran ( Studi Kasus : Komplek Perkantoran Bina Praja Rokan Hulu-Riau ). Universitas Andalas. Padang.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Indah Lestari, Dian Ariestadi, Imam Alfianto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





